| 翻訳と辞書 |
| United Haulers Assn., Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority
''United Haulers Assn., Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Mgmt. Auth.'', , was a United States Supreme Court case about interstate commerce. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion of the Court, holding that a New York state ordinance forcing private waste management companies to deliver waste to a public facility did not discriminate against interstate commerce. Justice Samuel Alito wrote a dissent.
== Background ==
The plaintiff, United Haulers, a not-for-profit corporation made up of waste management companies, sued the New York counties of Oneida and Herkimer, which controlled the Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. United Haulers claimed that county ordinances requiring all solid wastes and recyclables generated within the two counties to be delivered to one of several waste processing facilities owned by the Authority violated the Dormant Commerce Clause.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|